Showing posts with label Microsoft. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Microsoft. Show all posts

Do you think Windows Phone 7 will be a hit with consumers?

Do you think Windows Phone 7 will be a hit with consumers? - Search Implications of Windows Phone 7's Success or Failure


Microsoft showed off its new Windows Phone 7 devices this week. There are a lot of questions about how Microsoft will perform in the smartphone space, though they're clearly up to the challenge. Microsoft's success in this space also has big implications for the company's performance in the search market, which means search marketers should keep an eye on this.


If Windows Phone 7 doesn't work, Microsoft likely just try again (although some think this one is do or die). The Kin didn't work, but that doesn't mean Windows Phone 7 can't. The company ended Kin abruptly for a reason.


Microsoft has some catching up to do in this space. There's no doubt about that. Consumers have been buying up smartphones faster than ever, and established players like Blackberry, iPhone, and Android seem to be at the center of most users' attention.


Brian Chen at Wired has an interesting take. He says Windows Phone 7 will make Android look chaotic. "Microsoft may be late to the game with a consumer-savvy phone OS, but Windows Phone 7 is aiming to do right a lot of what Google is doing wrong," he says.


Microsoft requires manufacturers to include specific hardware elements (like specific buttons) to use Windows Phone 7. "The effort to control quality and consistency may be just what Microsoft needs to regain some ground in the phone battle," says Chen.


I'm not sure I agree with this take, but it's a theory. Of course, Google's "wrongdoing" is netting them a growing number of Android sales.

Can Microsoft give consumers a reason to choose Windows Phone 7? Nobody seems to be completely counting them out. Robert Scoble says, "This OS is beautiful. Unlike Nokia or RIM, Microsoft threw out the old OS and started from scratch. For the first time in a while they didn’t just copy Apple, either. They did a whole new UI from scratch. It uses tiles instead of the little icons on my iPhone. It has a very nice contact manager. It shows you all sorts of information from services and your social network up front. Buyers who see it in stores will be very impressed ..."


Here are a couple questions for you: Do consumers respect the Windows brand enough to make the move on their phones? Was Microsoft smart to use Windows Phone 7 as the name? A lot of people continue to buy Windows PCs based on familiarity. These same people aren't necessarily familiar with Windows on their phones. Granted, it's not the same experience, but from a brand perspective, it will be interesting to see how the decision pays off.


If the Windows Phone 7 initiative is successful and the OS gains significant adoption, it could mean big things for Bing. The inclusion of a Bing search hard key alone could dramatically increase the amount of Bing searches that are conducted. That's just one reason Microsoft really needs this to work.


Microsoft is coming from behind in the smartphone space, and they have some catching up to do, but the company has shown that its capable of penetrating markets where there is little room for new competitors. They've shown this with Bing. Bing is far from having Google's share of the search market, but there's no question it has become a significant competitor (much more than any other Microsoft search engine had). Google CEO Eric Schmidt even called it the company's main competitor.


The smartphone market is spread around more than the search market. There's no just one dominant player. There's no reason why Microsoft can't be a legitimate competitor. It may take a nice-sized marketing budget and some strategic partnerships, but that is nothing new for Microsoft. See Bing's history.


Do you think Microsoft can compete in the smartphone market? How big is Windows Phone 7 for Bing? Tell us what you think.




READ MORE - Do you think Windows Phone 7 will be a hit with consumers?

The End of the World as We Know It

The End of the World as We Know It. I dare you to name a more plugged-in media and communications technology reporter than New Yorker staff writer Ken Auletta. As comfortable interrogating a network executive as he is interviewing a software genius or bottling a human tornado like Ted Turner, Auletta builds his media-technology books the way a mason builds a wall -- upon a firm foundation, one brick at a time and as level as the horizon.

In "Googled," Auletta applies this technique -- which served him in previous books about the Microsoft antitrust suit, the fall of the television networks and the evolution of the wired world -- to chronicle the rise of Google, the world's favorite search engine. (Disclosure: Auletta, a nodding acquaintance of mine, quotes me once briefly -- and neutrally.)

If you read the newspapers and magazines that cover Auletta's beat, you already know the basic outlines of the Google story: In the mid-1990s, Stanford University graduate students Larry Page and Sergey Brin devised a new search engine that assessed the value of Web pages based on the links that point to it from other pages. Venture capitalists nurtured the young company, and by 2000 it was the Web's most visited search engine. A public offering in 2004 quickly made billionaires of the founders, as well as Eric Schmidt, the experienced chief executive they'd acquired, as the company revolutionized the advertising market. Today, Google's ubiquity has earned it the status of a verb. You don't just search for information about a person or a subject on the Web, you google it, and Google's search dominance has allowed it to reap 40 percent ($20 billion yearly) of all online advertising revenue. Auletta won unprecedented cooperation from the founders and the company brass to tell the inside story in great detail. But our deep familiarity with Google tends to work against his book. If you've read other books about Google (notably John Battelle's "The Search" and David A. Vise and Mark Malseed's "The Google Story," both published in 2005), the narrative will seem a little worn.

As many commentators have pointed out, Google didn't invent Web search, didn't invent free Web-mail, didn't invent online photo storage or online maps, didn't invent online advertising pegged to search terms, didn't invent blogs, blog search, cloud computing, desktop search, online word processing or a host of other Web-related services and products. The company owes its success less to innovation in all these fields than to the steady improvement of its core function -- its search engine. Remember, when Google really got going at the turn of the century, its competitors regarded search as a commodity and believed that the key to building a Web audience from which they could make money was building a "portal" -- a branded site that aggregated weather, stocks, news, advertising and tons of other content -- to which users would return again and again.

The managers at AOL, Yahoo and Microsoft strategized that keeping Web traffic circulating inside the portal's "walled garden" was the key to success. But the philosophy of Google's founders, Page and Brin, was different. The extreme wideness of the World Wide Web made search the fundamental problem to solve. "If we solve search, that means you can answer any question," Auletta quotes Page as saying. "Which means you can do anything." Google's Zen-simple home page, devoid of ads or other distractions, was designed to speed users to their search results, and those speedy, accurate results changed search from a commodity into a brand, a very respected brand, Auletta notes.

But should Google itself be trusted? Yes, trusted to produce terrific search results, reliable e-mail service, videos aplenty on its YouTube site and economical venues for advertising. But no further. As Auletta probes the sophistry behind the Google slogan "Don't be evil" with his well placed sources in media and technology, the portrait he draws is of a rapacious, opportunistic company that seeks to disrupt -- in classic capitalist fashion -- whole industries. Its Android operating system -- and now a cell phone of its own design -- have targeted the mobile phone business. Google Voice has been assigned to conquer the telephony industry. The Chrome browser and the Chrome operating system are aimed at toppling Microsoft's grip on the computer desktop. The Google Books service is a cannon pointed at the heart of publishers. One of Auletta's top sources regards the company as a veritable "Googzilla" that intends to become a digital Wal-Mart for shoppers.

Auletta's thorough, readable account of how the world has become Googled makes you long for the future chapters in the company's history. Will it falter, as Microsoft did, when the antitrust hounds bite it and it starts to choke on its own bureaucratic inertia? Having failed to win in the social media space now dominated by Facebook and Twitter, will it stage a comeback? How long before the next generation of computer whizzes finds a way to leapfrog Google?

Auletta surveys his sources for their speculations but wisely keeps his crystal ball in its case. The abiding lesson of "Googled" is that nobody realizes that they're being displaced until its too late. (washingtonpost.com )

READ MORE - The End of the World as We Know It

Pengaruh Virtual Memory Pada Windows

Pengaruh Virtual Memory Pada Windows. Supaya Restart Windows Lebih Cepat. Virtual Memory, atau yang lebih dikenal dengan nama swap file, merupakan memori bohong-bohongan yang terletak di dalam hard disk. Pada dasarnya, Virtual Memory berguna jika RAM yang terdapat di sistem sudah tidak mencukupi sehingga dipakailah ruang hard disk sebagai tempat penyimpanan sementara. Karena itu, tidak mengherankan jika ukuran Virtual Memory bisa disetel sampai 2 kalinya RAM sistem.

Tapi tahukah Anda, besar-kecilnya Virtual Memory dapat mempengaruhi kecepatan shutdown atau reboot Windows. Semakin besar Virtual Memory, semakin lama pula Windows melakukan reboot atau shutdown.





Begini solusi untuk mengatasinya.

  1. Klik menu “Start”, lalu ketik “Local Security Policy”.
  2. Atau coba ketikkan “secpol.msc” di menu Start. Lihat kolom kiri, lalu pilih “Security Settings > Local Policies > Security Options > Shutdown : Clear virtual memory pagefile”. Set value-nya menjadi “Disabled”.

Anda memiliki RAM sistem yang besar? Anda dapat pula menyetel supaya Windows berjalan tanpa Virtual Memory dengan cara ini.

  1. Klik kanan “Computer > Properties”. Pilih “Advanced system settings”.
  2. Klik “Settings” pada bagian Performance. Pada window “Performance Options”, klik tab “Advanced”.
  3. Di bagian “Virtual memory”, klik “Change”. Di situ Anda dapat melihat di kandar mana XP menaruh Virtual Memory.
  4. Untuk men-disable penggunaan Virtual Memory, pilih kandar di mana XP menaruh Virtual Memory (pagefile.sys), lalu klik “No Paging File”, dilanjutkan dengan mengklik “Set”. Setelah itu, reboot komputer Anda.

Virtual Memory ini bisa dibilang bagai buah simalakama. Misalnya, jika Anda ingin mempercepat shutdown atau reboot dengan men-disable fitur “Shutdown : Clear virtual memory pagefile” pada “Local Security Policy”, sistem Anda jadi kurang aman karena cracker bisa saja “melihat-lihat” isinya. Sebaliknya, bila Anda tidak memakai Virtual Memory, bisa-bisa sistem Anda menjadi kurang stabil.

Sebagai jalan tengah, bagi Anda yang memiliki RAM sistem berukuran besar, ada baiknya menggunakan sedikit Virtual Memory. Sebagai contoh, bila Anda memiliki 1GB RAM, Anda bisa memakai Virtual Memory sebesar 256MB atau 128MB dengan tetap menyetel “Shutdown : Clear virtual memory pagefile” menjadi “Enabled”. Besar-kecilnya Virtual Memory dapat disesuaikan dengan kebutuhan dan ruang hard disk. ( kompas.com )

READ MORE - Pengaruh Virtual Memory Pada Windows

Search Engines Unite On Sitemaps Autodiscovery

Search Engines Unite On Sitemaps Autodiscovery. Last November, Google, Microsoft Yahoo united to support sitemaps, a standardized method of submitting web pages through feeds to the search engines. Today, the three are now joined by Ask.com in supporting the system and an extension of it called autodiscovery. This is where the major search engines will automatically locate your sitemaps file if the location is listed in a robots.txt file. Announcements are up from Google and Ask now Yahoo and Microsoft. and

Information on how to create sitemaps files can be found at the Sitemaps.org site. Aside from the sitemaps XML formal, you can also provide RSS 2.0 or Atom 0.3 or 1.0 feeds. That’s handy for those with blogs that already generate these feeds.

Sitemaps XML files too complicated? Don’t run a blog? Note that the site has newly expanded information on how you can submit a simple list of URLs in a text file.

In the past, if you created a sitemaps file, you then had to manually tell the search engines where to find it. With today’s announcement, search engines will check your robots.txt file for a link to a sitemaps file, then get the file from that location. This is a big plus because all the major search engines regularly check robots.txt files as part of their ordinary crawling.

To add the location, just put a line like this anywhere in your robots.txt file:

Sitemap: LOCATION-OF-SITEMAPS-FILE

Replace the LOCATION-OF-SITEMAPS-FILE with the actual location. For example, if you ran a site at mywonderfulsite.com and had a sitemaps file called allmypages.xml in your top level, the reference would be like this:

Sitemap: http://mywonderfulsite.com/allmypages.xml

Have more than one sitemaps file? Ideally, you’d create a special "sitemaps index" file that links to all of them, then put a link to the sitemaps index file in your robots.txt file. If that sounds like too much work, you can have more than one sitemaps URL listed in the robots.txt file.

Aside from autodiscovery, you can also ping Google and Yahoo with the location of your file. The Sitemaps.org site has more instructions on this in general. For specifics:

  • Google: See here. Note that this pinging is different than the pinging Google also supports for blog search.
  • Yahoo: See here and here. Unlike Google, the same pinging system is used for both web and blog search, to my understanding.

Both Google and Yahoo also allow you to manually submit sitemaps files. In both cases, doing this via their Google Webmaster Central or Yahoo Site Explorer systems gives you access to specialized monitoring and reporting tools or information on how they crawl you.

For more about these tools, or how each individual search engine handles sitemaps files, please see the links below:

Keep in mind that Microsoft and Ask are still lacking references to sitemaps information, but I expect this will change over time.

READ MORE - Search Engines Unite On Sitemaps Autodiscovery